From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr 27 13:30:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA05717
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com (suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com [158.147.19.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA05712
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from suw2k.hisd.harris.com by suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA10360; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:27:33 -0400
Received: by suw2k.hisd.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA15610; Sat, 27 Apr 96 16:27:13 EDT
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 16:27:13 EDT
From: jleppek@suw2k.hisd.harris.com (James Leppek)
Message-Id: <9604272027.AA15610@suw2k.hisd.harris.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: posix timespec vs timeval
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

What are the correct member names in struct timespec?
I just received another update of the MIT posix threads an they
now use timespec but have the members as tv_sec and tv_nsec.
In freebsd it is ts_sec and ts_nsec (makes more sense but that doesn't
mean its right :-) )?
I have got to change something so I was hoping someone
would know the correct spec.

Thanks
Jim Leppek