From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 27 13:30:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA05717 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com (suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com [158.147.19.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA05712 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from suw2k.hisd.harris.com by suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA10360; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:27:33 -0400 Received: by suw2k.hisd.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15610; Sat, 27 Apr 96 16:27:13 EDT Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 16:27:13 EDT From: jleppek@suw2k.hisd.harris.com (James Leppek) Message-Id: <9604272027.AA15610@suw2k.hisd.harris.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: posix timespec vs timeval Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk What are the correct member names in struct timespec? I just received another update of the MIT posix threads an they now use timespec but have the members as tv_sec and tv_nsec. In freebsd it is ts_sec and ts_nsec (makes more sense but that doesn't mean its right :-) )? I have got to change something so I was hoping someone would know the correct spec. Thanks Jim Leppek