From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 10 0:49:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9992637B479 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:49:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA68090; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:49:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: void Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "iowait" CPU state References: <20001107054413.A1983@firedrake.org> <20001109175050.C21468@firedrake.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 10 Nov 2000 09:49:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: void's message of "Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:50:50 +0000" Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG void writes: > Is there any reason top couldn't add these up and report a %iowait > like Solaris'? Yes. It would conceal valuable information. Do the adding up in your head. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message