Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:12:55 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> To: magudexter <magudexter@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: k6 or i686 optimization on AMD Athlon? Message-ID: <200209021313.g82DCt0O088941@peedub.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Sep 2002 05:57:05 PDT." <20020902125705.39456.qmail@web20310.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
magudexter writes: > Btw do you know anything about the non exec feature on > the i386 in FreeBSD - meaning that the stack no longer > executes code; this is a great increase in security as > it is the usual method for buffer overflows? Or do you > know where to ask/look for it? > IIRC there was discussion about using this feature, but things like signal trampolines on the stack require that the code be executable. The best place to ask about his would be hackers. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@jennejohn.org gj@freebsd.org gj@denx.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209021313.g82DCt0O088941>