From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Nov 25 13:56:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479D21AD513 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47M7qQ1D89z4Rt9 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 29E1B1AD512; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A6A1AD511 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47M7qQ0K80z4Rt8 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE7C6DAD7 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xAPDuHo4011053 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAPDuHkc011052 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242223] mail/dovecot: incompatible with security.bsd.hardlink_check_{g,u}id Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tphilipp@potion-studios.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ler@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:56:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242223 Bug ID: 242223 Summary: mail/dovecot: incompatible with security.bsd.hardlink_check_{g,u}id Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ler@FreeBSD.org Reporter: tphilipp@potion-studios.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(ler@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: ler@FreeBSD.org Hello, similar to PR 218392, the port is incompatible with security.bsd.hardlink_check_gid and security.bsd.hardlink_check_uid sysctl flags set to 1, usually done for hardening. As with the mentioned PR, those flags also affect dovecot's use of lock fil= es. However, I *think* it's less dangerous, though, b/c it simply cannot write a lock file anymore (which are hardlinks in this case) and just gives up on whatever it planned to do. Long story short, I think it's worth adding a warning to pkg-message for th= is, as well. Thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=