From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Mar 29 14:28:48 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C1DE037B537; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:28:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from ade@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA63551;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:28:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:28:46 -0800 (PST)
From: <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200003292228.OAA63551@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: jay.krell@cornell.edu, ade@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/15481: ports/devel/codecrusader slightly broken
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: ports/devel/codecrusader slightly broken

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: ade
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 29 14:25:45 PST 2000
State-Changed-Why: 
Updates to ports should be provided in unified diff(1) format.
Secondly, putting in symbolic links outside of the ${PREFIX},
just to deal with (broken) code that expects a particular
filesystem layout is bad.
Finally, looking at the build logs from bento, it would
appear that this port is broken in a number of other ways, too.

So, unless I hear otherwise, this PR will be closed
one month from today.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message