From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 30 7:48:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E836B37B422 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A484D10F40F; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:48:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <04a401c0e917$a968a120$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , "Valeriy E. Ushakov" , References: <005e01c0e913$0803a180$3028680a@tgt.com> <20010530183940.A3569@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> <00c301c0e917$003b74b0$3028680a@tgt.com> Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:49:00 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Someone on irc mentioned that something like ipf that cannot be modified should go into the ports. Not my personal belief, but I thought I would relay it anyhow. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" ; Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:44 AM Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well > Nothing in that article has convinced me that FreeBSD developers can change > the source at their will and distribute it -- according to the IPFilter > licence. That right should be implicit in ALL FreeBSD system level source > code. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message