Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 17:01:49 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@mail.cicely.de> To: Tim <tim@futuresouth.com> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>, Drew Eckhardt <drew@PoohSticks.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: eXperimental bandwidth delay product code (was Re: Network performance tuning.) Message-ID: <20010715170149.C26435@cicely20.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20010715061915.A59691@futuresouth.com>; from tim@futuresouth.com on Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 06:19:15AM -0500 References: <200107130128.f6D1SFE59148@earth.backplane.com> <200107130217.f6D2HET67695@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20010712223042.A77503@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <200107131708.f6DH8ve65071@earth.backplane.com> <20010713132903.A21847@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <200107131847.f6DIlJv67457@earth.backplane.com> <200107150943.f6F9hhx06763@earth.backplane.com> <20010715061915.A59691@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 06:19:15AM -0500, Tim wrote: > Cool! We were just commenting that it's too bad dummynet/ALTQ really > couldn't help the interactive response for us dial-up users. Anyway, I > just tried this on my dial-up connection on a fresh -STABLE but don't > really notice any appreciable difference. > > net.inet.tcp.tcp_send_dynamic_enable: 1 > net.inet.tcp.tcp_send_dynamic_min: 1024 (tried it with default 4096 too) > > My ssh response is still about 3 or 4 seconds behind my typing. What > should a dial-up user expect? If you don't see a difference with a dial-up line you see exactly what is expected from this - which is a good sign. The situations where it should bring performance are different from yours. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010715170149.C26435>