From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 11 20:23:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blues.ghis.net (pppc2-1.eisa.net.au [203.166.251.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E49D15128 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 20:23:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@blues.ghis.net) Received: (from jim@localhost) by blues.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA36999 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:22:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jim) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:22:39 +1000 From: Jim Mock To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: xchat & xchat-devel? Message-ID: <19990712132238.A36959@blues.ghis.net> Reply-To: jim@blues.ghis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, I'm working on updating the xchat port to the latest version (I'm the maintainer), but it (as the current port) are both development versions (1.1.0 is the current port, 1.1.2 is the upgrade I'm about to diff). There's also a 'stable' version of xchat which is 1.0. What I'm wondering is whether there should be two xchat ports.. xchat and xchat-devel. The reason I ask is because the newer versions (first 1.1.1 and now 1.1.2) won't compile on FreeBSD with native language support enabled and I think some people might want it. Is this a good idea? If so, I'll shar up the xchat-devel and send-pr it. The older 1.0 version will need to be resurrected as well. If not and noone cares, I'll send the diffs to upgrade the existing port to 1.1.2 without NLS. Later, -- - Jim Mock - jim@blues.ghis.net - systems administrator - ghis.NET - - work: http://www.ghis.net/ - personal: http://www.ghis.net/~jim/ - - FreeBSD 'zine: http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - - FreeBSD: http://advocacy.freebsd.org/ - jim@advocacy.FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message