From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 11 04:07:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA04642 for current-outgoing; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 04:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA04635 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from imb@localhost) by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.7.5/BSD4.4) id VAA10387 Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:04:38 +1000 (EST) From: michael butler Message-Id: <199604111104.VAA10387@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> Subject: Re: /var/mail default permissions?? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:04:37 +1000 (EST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199604110753.JAA04132@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Apr 11, 96 09:53:27 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J Wunsch writes: > Me too, but i knew where the problem was, quickly left elm, edited my > inbox, started elm again, and had to smile about Terry's > explanation. ;-) > (This From_ convention is really the worst thing in the entire mail > handling.) One (good ?) reason why Sun & SVR4 went for a 'Content-Length' header line .. it helped some sysadmins from having heart-failure trying to track "anonymous" messages down that didn't appear in their logs :-) michael