From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 12 14:44:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA22639
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nemeton.com.au (gw.nemeton.com.au [203.8.3.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA22634
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24685 invoked from network); 12 Jun 1997 21:43:49 -0000
Received: from topaz.nemeton.com.au (203.8.3.18)
  by nemeton.com.au with SMTP; 12 Jun 1997 21:43:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 2327 invoked from network); 12 Jun 1997 21:47:37 -0000
Received: from localhost.nemeton.com.au (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost.nemeton.com.au with SMTP; 12 Jun 1997 21:47:37 -0000
To: Josh Tiefenbach <josh@ican.net>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB v2.0 
In-reply-to: <19970612120819.60013@ican.net> 
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 07:47:36 +1000
Message-ID: <2325.866152056@nemeton.com.au>
From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 12 Jun 1997 12:08:19 -0400  Josh Tiefenbach wrote:

> I noticed poking around Keith Bostic's web page that he has released db
> v2.0.6. Has there been any nacsent thought to importing it into the tree, even
> taking into account that the new package is not compatible at the binary level
> with v1.85?

The licence changed too.  Why not make it a port (and a package :) and
postpone decisions about incorporating it into the tree.

Giles