From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 12 06:23:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D804E37B401 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF1B43F75 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:23:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (acs-24-154-229-196.zoominternet.net [24.154.229.196]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h6CDNTl1093648; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 09:23:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 09:17:37 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20030712091737.57808fd7.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030712082445.GA61557@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030712082445.GA61557@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Change to ports.inc X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:23:32 -0000 On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:24:45 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Can someone please review/correct my lame markup in the following > patch? > > Kris > > Index: ports.inc > =================================================================== > RCS file: /mnt2/ncvs/www/en/ports/ports.inc,v > retrieving revision 1.65 > diff -u -u -r1.65 ports.inc > --- ports.inc 22 Feb 2003 22:00:07 -0000 1.65 > +++ ports.inc 11 Jul 2003 22:49:29 -0000 > @@ -6,6 +6,17 @@ > tremendous rate. >

> > +

The Ports Collection supports the latest release on the > +FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE branches. Older releases are not > +supported and may or may not work correctly with an up-to-date ports > +collection. Over time, changes to the ports collection may rely on > +features that are not present in older releases. Wherever convenient, > +we try not to gratuitously break support for recent releases, but it > +is sometimes unavoidable. When this occurs, patches contributed by > +the user community to maintain support for older releases will usually > +be committed. > +

> + This looks good to me, Kris. -- Tom Rhodes