Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:01:15 +1000
From:      freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: linux-threads
Message-ID:  <4F1AC52B.2070202@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com>
References:  <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/22/12 00:02, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 06:57:27PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>> By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the
>> updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads is one
>> of them.
> The portsmon email is strictly mechanical.  It's just going off the
> fact that the maintainer for the port is ports@.
>
> fwiw.
Yeah I'm aware of that. What I'm wondering is why it might not be 
maintained by emulation@ instead of ports?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F1AC52B.2070202>