From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 14:05:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E59106566C for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A86F8FC15 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9275C28; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:42 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C5D55C21; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1AC52B.2070202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:01:15 +1000 From: freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux-threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:05:12 -0000 On 01/22/12 00:02, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 06:57:27PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the >> updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads is one >> of them. > The portsmon email is strictly mechanical. It's just going off the > fact that the maintainer for the port is ports@. > > fwiw. Yeah I'm aware of that. What I'm wondering is why it might not be maintained by emulation@ instead of ports?