From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 01:04:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FF01065674 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:04:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E348FC17 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:04:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id m6O14ZR9029285; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:04:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:04:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:04:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <200807231846.33728.jhb@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200807231846.33728.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I like my rc.d boot messages :( X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:04:38 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, John Baldwin wrote: > So I upgraded a test box today to HEAD and got my first taste of the trimmed > down boot messages. I can appreciate the slimness of them. However, > personally I actually find the detail useful (at least sometimes). > Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be a knob I can flip to actually get > all the messages back as /etc/rc unconditionally uses 'quietstart' rather > than 'start'. Am I the only one who finds it useful to know which daemon is > making my startup hang for an extra second? No, you are not. I too would like that. -- DE