From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 22 00:12:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CFE106566C for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:12:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artemb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BB98FC17 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1731213ghr.13 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:12:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cQQ1W39T70+4oxxgcPldJgfaPijkA7GbxZWILhHFi7U=; b=uUJAtWk/5xnVeSTTM3gnhLW4fdIWVKaIXK105uMZFLxp1VpTx+aKvfggPdCuOrzbV4 IQucrU8lDEaeqpHAilkCvtu1AASAuu9qcUqvoMuWxxc3sPsNhAHzN5gKNmQPWzjjvdXp /tInuFpnurO5n5iND5W3KP9uCqRfmIQFEb6JipH5Vh3/cupZsIB1b6UB2/mV+G29pWSk HEovYceZypAO3rpq7HFA2MemaO0yUTYlvyRenvFhOmfkZb0fvIESNluWAuB+TDuAdHoF fC+jtHNEwm1dIdgxCfg0hdn8ftNhlRKKFYV/5wjK5cKB7lk/DT8+16vtoX1RROse5VJc pUjw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.126.168 with SMTP id b28mr5790700yhi.88.1332375130821; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: artemb@gmail.com Received: by 10.147.181.4 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:12:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:12:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 55hKcW2jWGMSBdZmM-ER_0Y859Y Message-ID: From: Artem Belevich To: andy thomas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS read/write performance slows with time X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:12:11 -0000 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:56 PM, andy thomas wrote: > A server running 64-bit FreeBSD 8.0 boots from a SATA disk and then mounts a ... > But over a period of time, this performance begins to deteriorate and after > 180 days of uptime If it's indeed 8.0 that you are running, I would strongly recommend upgrading to 8-STABLE or 8.3 when it's released. A *lot* of things in ZFS got fixed/improved since ZFSv13 in 8.0. --Artem