From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 17 20:03:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F37B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:03:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web14802.mail.yahoo.com (web14802.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.224.218])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CB4243D2F
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:03:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rosti_bsd@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040318040353.28031.qmail@web14802.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [192.117.108.59] by web14802.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:03:53 PST
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:03:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Rostislav Krasny <rosti_bsd@yahoo.com>
To: Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040318025434.GB875@vista.netmemetic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-04:05.openssl question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:03:54 -0000

--- Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:20:09PM -0800, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> > --- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> > > From the URL you mentioned: "Most applications have no ability to
> > > use Kerberos ciphersuites and will therefore be unaffected."
> > 
> > Do you imply that applications with ability to use Kerberos
> > ciphersuites are impossible to be implemented for current versions
> > of FreeBSD?
> 
> The text before the above quoted "Most applications have no
> ability..."
> read
> 
>   A remote attacker could perform a carefully crafted SSL/TLS
>   handshake against a server configured to use Kerberos ciphersuites
>   [...]
> 
> Instead of asking about impossibility in the abstract, ask if you do
> run servers that support Kerberos cipthersuites and, if yes, how to
> configure your software to not use them.

My original question was about specified vulnerability of OpenSSL, not
about applicaion that use it.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com