Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:12:00 -0500 From: mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Walter von Entferndt <walter.von.entferndt@posteo.net>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning and monitoring write intensive server Message-ID: <e3abffbf-0b8b-2652-b8da-57ea010ec7cd@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <2002412.uJW0cDvVUg@t450s.local.lan> References: <mailman.51.1612699204.90685.freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> <2002412.uJW0cDvVUg@t450s.local.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/7/2021 10:50 AM, Walter von Entferndt wrote: > > - Inserting an I/O scheduler might improve performance, too (gsched(8)). > Yes, UFS is likely faster than ZFS on such a setup, but ZFS offers many > advantages in terms of administration, fault tolerance & reliability. Especially if the data is compressible, zfs can be a big win. --Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e3abffbf-0b8b-2652-b8da-57ea010ec7cd>