From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 00:17:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059DAAAB3A3 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7F9C3E for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2R00BEHQHBOY00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:24:49 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C65F27.5090802@sorbs.net> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:17:43 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Alphons van Werven Cc: Walter Schwarzenfeld , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> In-reply-to: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:17:54 -0000 Alphons van Werven wrote: > Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > >> But this could be overwritten with the next update. >> > [snip] > >> But this could also [sic] overwritten. >> > > You're using portsnap for your updates, I presume? Subversion will not > override local changes (at least not without asking first). I have a tree > here that contains local ports and locally modified ports. That's exactly > why I use SVN instead of portsnap. > > You might get similar results if you use Git to update your tree, I don't > know about that. > > HTH, > > AvW > > You know you can all run your own portsnap server to allow you to include local changes? -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/