From owner-freebsd-isdn Tue Nov 24 04:46:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA16690 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:46:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from guerilla.foo.bar (hennen32s.iserlohn.netsurf.de [194.195.194.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA16658 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:45:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sas@schell.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guerilla.foo.bar (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA06016; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:45:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:45:28 +0100 (MET) From: Sascha Schumann X-Sender: sas@guerilla.foo.bar To: Malte Lance cc: van.woerkom@netcologne.de, marc@netcologne.de, G.Sittig@abo.FreiePresse.DE, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: isppp + dynamic IP In-Reply-To: <199811240859.JAA04306@neuron.webmore.prv> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 24 Nov 1998, Malte Lance wrote: > On 23 Nov, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Malte Lance wrote: > > > >> On 22 Nov, Marc van Woerkom wrote: > >> > > >> > My guess is that this is some sort of control packet, by an older > >> > request of mine, that has not been completed (e.g. a lame ftp transfer), > >> > and that is now fooled because the IP at time of the request > >> > is different from the present IP now due to a hang up in between. > > > > These are sockets in WAIT state - somewhen timing out and sending one more > > packet. > > > >> Try this with telnet on linux. Does it work ? > > > > Yes. > > > >> As i said, there is much more than this. > > > > Not really. > > > >> Read the discussion i mentioned above. It also gives the reason, > >> why this solution only works for some clients. > > > > It works for Linux. > > Hm ... then it should be possible with FreeBSD and isdn4bsd. > What do you think about it Sascha ? I'm no kernel developer, but deciding on the size of the patch (274 lines diff), I'd say it is not as bad as you made it :-) If someone is interested, the original patch can be found on http://www.linuxhq.com/patch/20-p0468.html with a short description. Sascha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message