From owner-freebsd-sparc Wed Jan 19 8:12:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506A215254 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:12:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrs@enteract.com) Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (jrs@shell-2.enteract.com [207.229.143.41]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA80274; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:12:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jrs@enteract.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:12:06 -0600 (CST) From: John Sconiers To: bpechter@shell.monmouth.com Cc: Wes Peters , freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sparc Port -- sounds good to me In-Reply-To: <200001191159.GAA03673@bg-tc-ppp596.monmouth.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Great... > Should we start with OpenBSD and begin with the userland stuff first > to see how much ports over easily? > Oops... We've got even more hardware. I forgot the ELC I've got as well... Quick question....shouldn't we start with NetBSD.....I'm under the impression that OpenBSD's port _IS_ NetBSD's port with a few bug fixes and stronger security and starting from NetBSD would be easier?? I may be wrong. JOHN To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message