From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 5 15: 5:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pez.hyperreal.org (pez.hyperreal.org [207.181.224.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50FD51535A for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@hyperreal.org) Received: (qmail 19362 invoked by uid 4000); 5 May 1999 22:06:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 May 1999 22:06:55 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 15:06:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Behlendorf To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BitKeeper (was Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) In-Reply-To: <21787.925610260@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 1 May 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > My suggestion would be to wait and see how bitkeeper pans out. Enough > people in the Linux camp have already looked at CVSup and gone "ooh, > sexy!" that I think there will already be significant pressure to > develop similar tools for the bitkeeper environment. When that > happens, we can start to look at this more seriously. I think that's wise. I'd also recommend people check out Bitkeeper's license before making any final decisions. It's not GPL, BSD, or any other Open Source license. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message