From owner-cvs-all  Mon Nov 18  5:47:16 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4BD5C37B401; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 05:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from quanta.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp (quanta.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.33.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7725943E4A; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 05:47:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp)
Received: from localhost (quanth.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.33.130])
	by quanta.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.12.5/3.7W/00091819) with ESMTP id gAIDgkHh032599;
	Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:42:46 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:45:23 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20021118.224523.640912260.maho@scarlatti.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: marius@alchemy.franken.de
Cc: maho@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, alexander@leidinger.net
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/ifc Makefile pkg-comment pkg-descr
 pkg-plist ports/lang/ifc/files assert_fail.c cpio-exclude cxa_atexit.c
 cxa_finalize.c errno_location.c ld.c linux_file.c mcount.S patch-aa
 patch-ifc stderr.c sysconf.c
From: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (Nakata Maho)
Reply-To: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp
In-Reply-To: <20021118115407.GQ89667@newtrinity.zeist.de>
References: <200211180927.gAI9RWOa074354@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20021118115407.GQ89667@newtrinity.zeist.de>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.1.14 (Cuyahoga Valley)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> the freebsd-ports of icc and ifc still cannot coexist as both ports patch
> the libraries in different ways but install them to the same location,
> i.e. overwrite each others' libraries. therefore please revert the backout
> of the check for icc in the ifc-port.

I read through codes(but not deeply concerned),
and I think simply install icc over ifc is ok, but ifc over icc won't be good.
Well, extensive test should be done for both compiler...

At least `ld' is the superset of icc version.
In some way they can be unified.
-- 
 Nakata Maho

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message