From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 17 23:38:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA00455 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA00450 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA00429; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607180638.XAA00429@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: Warner Losh cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cygnus Engineering Talk on Linux In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:56:48 MDT." <199607180556.XAA28396@rover.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:38:14 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk There is the big flame fest going on Usenet comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc -- check out the thread TCP Latency ... Just do a net search on lmbench and I am sure you going to find the web page... BTW: where are the patches for gcc 2.7.3 ... Tnks, Amancio >From The Desk Of Warner Losh : > : : And things like lmbench don't help also :( > : > : :-). I just got asked in private mail how I could run a TCP/IP stack > : on my machine with such horrible latency. I told them I ran a stack > : that worked and it went down hill from there. > : > : What the heck is lmbench and why is it so wrong? > > Dang, shouldn't have hit that send so fast. > > I don't want to start a flame war here. If there is a pointer, then > point me at. I saw some stuff in the archive, but not enough to > answer the particular question that I had (re latency). > > Thanks a bunch... > > Warner > >