From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 27 13:58:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196F11065672; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE09E8FC14; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:58:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id BE61B73098; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:03:09 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Maxim Ignatenko Message-ID: <20090427140309.GA62749@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20090426215740.GA33188@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090426224729.GA34800@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [dummynet] Several queues connected to one pipe: "dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:58:01 -0000 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:51:18PM +0300, Maxim Ignatenko wrote: > 2009/4/27 Luigi Rizzo : > > > > ok there seems to be no change related to dummynet between these > > two versions so I am not sure where to look. > > Could you double check what is the last working version ? > > > Yes, r191201 have this problems too (it seems, i didn't updated for a > long time). > Now I updated to r190864 (just before last change on ip_dummynet.c) - > all works fine. Should I now check r190865? yes it would be great if you could identify a specific change that caused the problem. There is one thing particularly tricky in one of the dummynet changes, because some fields changed between 32/64 bits and signed/unsigned. I may have unadvertently introduced some conversion bug. thanks a lot for the feedback cheers luigi