From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 11 07:42:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F62E106568F; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC0B8FC18; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so535015pxi.3 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:42:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpKGC8QBSeEN+S8fv/P6HKceWlAZPvmnlKnjp9owglo=; b=XCZa6bVkG1cr1E3DKxX7hAKxiB19fGGy2BSwP6/rB69wJ0zTb2eFU+H8RG18C7sYHt DnRBtl/P7uRMukKxPDk4xwkRNRgPJ52yaHfv6d6EZj2PIyxfjZocgJnWd3lmV+hZkCWP rQFlZjd0YxSIJKBsaQ/Tz0F6vS4Sodp/2W+k0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tC4HzyhwFT6h2IVRDowuJUcJ7vBKHr79UCr+iosz15RPtQASwbnNkuXppFOOe0icR2 D6aWhLuMOPaqS8cM+kIrIMi+HdNtaVM9+wAbOgRlsqcrT7f5TuvZYVQc05DrOofZBKhR IuYzEeOTgNKqzBOa9mDXTpyMcQxVe/oUVMR9k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.6.42 with SMTP id 42mr591932wff.88.1260517356618; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:42:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091210095122.a164bf95.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20091210144141.GB834@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091210095122.a164bf95.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:42:36 -0600 Message-ID: <11167f520912102342y349ebf03tccf886da0ecf53e9@mail.gmail.com> From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Bill Moran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root exploit for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:42:37 -0000 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Bill Moran wrot= e: > In response to Anton Shterenlikht : > >> >From my information security manager: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand)= and has a >> =A0 =A0 =A0 (comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for exa= mple: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Root-exploit-for-= FreeBSD-873352.html > > Are you trying to make your infosec guy look like an idiot? =A0Does he > realize that FreeBSD has a grand total of 16 security problems for all > of 2009? =A0Hell, Microsoft has that many in an average month. > > If he can find something (other than OpenBSD) with a better record than > that, I'd love to hear about it. Either your infosec guy is close to incompetent or this is flame bait. I have tried looking around and OpenBSD appears to be the undisputed #1 track record in terms of security and FreeBSD is #2 (I didn't count dragonflyBSD) Linux is Just horrible, and Windows well enough said :) Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks