From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 8 11:52:53 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA00464 for current-outgoing; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA00449; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA02677; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 14:52:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 14:52:48 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9606081852.AA02677@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: As of 960608, routed now complains bitterly.. In-Reply-To: <199606080818.BAA05012@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199606080818.BAA05012@freefall.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > Messages of the form: > Jun 8 01:10:39 time routed[57]: rnh_addaddr() failed for 204.216.27.0 mask=0xfffffff0 > Jun 8 01:11:09 time routed[57]: rnh_addaddr() failed for 204.216.27.0 mask=0xfffffff0 > Spew where no messages spewed in former times. Just FYI.. This means that your netmasks are not configured correctly, either on the host, or a router to that network, or both. It happens when routed is listening to RIP packets labeled with one netmask on an interface which is locally configured for another. For example, for a while I had one router configured for 255.255.255.0 and one for 255.255.240.0 (both on the same subnet), and it complained bitterly until I fixed the configurations to agree. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant