From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 00:23:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE3116A412 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from spunkymail-a18.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC9343D5A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from sauron.lan.box (unknown [200.180.161.150]) by spunkymail-a18.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7D95B530; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:22:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:22:58 -0200 From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez To: "O. Hartmann" Message-Id: <20061122222258.3bcae487.rnsanchez@wait4.org> In-Reply-To: <45648649.4000408@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20061122170002.GA2988@rabbit> <45648649.4000408@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: SYS_WAIT4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:23:03 -0000 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:18:01 +0100 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > No, I complain about the dramatic performance drainage of FreeBSD and > would also say, that my main purpose for an UNIX driven box isn't the > service for network like routing, DNS and others. But I'm frightened by > the poor network performance when I have MPI in vi> OK, but DNS queries are short (less than 1 KB). You probably know much better than me (I also work with scientific computing, but it's been only 4 years) that you can't expect terrific performance with thousands of messages per second -- this will always be your bottleneck. As such, I believe it's unfair (and imprecise) to use DNS performance results for a group communication (MPI) environment comparison. I had good experiences with MPI + FreeBSD, although don't have numbers to prove. Regards. :) -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."