From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 18:08:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C6816A41F for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from postmaster.etv.net (postmaster.etv.net [208.14.190.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8660143D58 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:08:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from work.efinley.com ([205.161.203.55] helo=elliotdevelop) by postmaster.etv.net with smtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EyYmE-00050L-Hv; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:08:22 -0700 Message-ID: <036701c61ac7$d67e3fd0$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> From: "Elliot Finley" To: "Bob Johnson" , "Kevin Kinsey" References: <03a301c616c7$69f896c0$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> <43C5454A.5000404@daleco.biz> <54db43990601111031w2d77cf79xc3f0f9417d87d9e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:08:18 -0700 Organization: Emery Telcom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup6.us.freebsd.org worthless? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Elliot Finley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:08:35 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Johnson" On 1/11/06, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Elliot Finley wrote: > > >Connected to cvsup6.us.freebsd.org > >Server message: Collection "ports-all" release "cvs" is not available here > > > > > >also, the same thing with src-all. Is this temporary or permanent? > > [...] > > If you would show your supfile ... I'm guessing it's a config issue, > but not enough info here to say positively. [...] }cvsup6 has been refusing connections for several days. If it is }accepting them now, that's an improvement. Perhaps they are bringing }it back up and don't have everything loaded yet. I think it would be better for cvsup6 not to respond at all, rather than respond but have no content. As it is, it breaks fastest_cvsup. Elliot