From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 13:25:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D11455C1 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953C41749 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC2361DE; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 854781D0; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:25:04 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Pawel Biernacki Subject: Re: Proposal References: Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:25:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Pawel Biernacki's message of "Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:36:48 +0100") Message-ID: <86fvlm7hzj.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 13:25:10 -0000 Pawel Biernacki writes: > I understand that this is voluntary role and you have another (real > life) responsibilities that=E2=80=99s why I'd like to propose an idea of = (at > least partially) paid position of Security Officer, because we all > need quick and efficient response in cases like that. Having a paid Security Officer would not have made any difference. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no