From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 19 13:25:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB93106566B for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.swip.net [212.247.154.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B588FC13 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=kr--chbQIzcA:10 a=bMpJJRlrZcUA:10 a=OxBaG04xRLI3P93Eg0oA:9 a=UKNK7hNKam-AXAJOuxJ2cwcW4T0A:4 Received: from [62.113.132.61] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO [10.37.1.92]) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTPA id 1226438129; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:25:25 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:27:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20090419134204.57ad25a7.ubm@u-boot-man.de> In-Reply-To: <20090419134204.57ad25a7.ubm@u-boot-man.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904191527.58168.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Marc UBM Bocklet Subject: Re: minor annoyance with usb transition (or pilot error) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:25:27 -0000 On Sunday 19 April 2009, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: > Hiho! :-) > > I'm in the process of upgrading to the latest -current (I'm currently > running -current as of 02. Jan. 2009). > > I was using the new usb stack with the 02. Jan. -current and > consequently had to change my kernel config back to the old usb naming > scheme (after changing to the temporary new usb naming scheme in > January). > > While doing this, "device ugen" caused my kernconf to fail, I > had to comment it out. Including "device udbp" makes buildkernel fail > (I can reproduce this and post the error, but I believe this is known). Did you include Netgraph options before including udbp ? The udbp module builds ? > I was wondering if UPDATING should mention that device ugen is no > longer needed (if thats the case), else people using their old kernel > config will have it fail until they comment "device ugen" out. --HPS