Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 11:50:56 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell <cimaxp1!jb@melb.werple.net.au> To: suw2k.hisd.harris.com!jleppek@melb.werple.net.au (James Leppek) Cc: freefall.freebsd.org!freebsd-hackers@melb.werple.net.au Subject: Re: posix timespec vs timeval Message-ID: <199604280150.LAA04581@melb.werple.net.au> In-Reply-To: <9604272027.AA15610@suw2k.hisd.harris.com> from "James Leppek" at Apr 27, 96 04:27:13 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What are the correct member names in struct timespec? time_t tv_sec long tv_nsec > I just received another update of the MIT posix threads an they > now use timespec but have the members as tv_sec and tv_nsec. > In freebsd it is ts_sec and ts_nsec (makes more sense but that doesn't > mean its right :-) )? FreeBSD is *WRONG*. I find #ifdef'ing things for FreeBSD really annoying. At least NetBSD made the change when it was pointed out to them... > I have got to change something so I was hoping someone > would know the correct spec. > > Thanks > Jim Leppek > -- John Birrell CIMlogic Pty Ltd jb@cimlogic.com.au 119 Cecil Street Ph +61 3 9690 6900 South Melbourne Vic 3205 Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Australia Mob +61 18 353 137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604280150.LAA04581>