From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 2 12:55:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA23645 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from squirrel.tgsoft.com (squirrel.tgsoft.com [207.167.64.183]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA23632 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:55:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 11073 invoked by uid 128); 2 Apr 1997 20:55:13 -0000 Date: 2 Apr 1997 20:55:13 -0000 Message-ID: <19970402205513.11072.qmail@squirrel.tgsoft.com> From: mark thompson To: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-reply-to: message from Terry Lambert on Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:51:39 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: Code maintenance Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: Terry Lambert Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:51:39 -0700 (MST) > > > Then adding the code into the tree is a 'bad thing', since it becomes > > > unsupported. If no-one is willing to incorporate/support the code, then > > > it shouldn't be incorporated. > > > > Better that it be lost forever? > > Yes, see the ft(4) and aic(4) drivers for two good examples. Both > sorely lack a maintainer, and nobody seems to be interested in doing > this job. Hmmm.... i have volunteered before to maintain ft, since tapes are kind of a (twisted) specialty of mine. My only request is that someone donate the drives to test on, since i don't use QIC format any more. My offer to help kind of got blown off. I understand that everyone is up to their respective keisters in release engineering, but it seems pretty clear to me that there is not percieved to be a crying need for this alleged maintenance. -mark