From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Feb 23 10:35:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24311
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA24305;
          Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:35:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15754(4)>; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:34:34 PST
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177476>; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:34:20 -0800
To: Mike Pritchard <mpp@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: henrich@msu.edu, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/2692 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Feb 97 23:22:20 PST."
             <199702230722.XAA25824@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:34:14 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <97Feb23.103420pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Mike Pritchard <mpp@freefall.freebsd.org> wrote:
>Duplicate of PR# 1910.  However, in this case, find is
>doing as it should: reporting "expoitable" file names that
>would have been handed off to xargs.

What about "find -print0 | xargs -0"?  I thought these were implemented
in response to the PR; were the appropriate scripts modified to use the
new flags?

  Bill