From owner-cvs-all Fri Jul 30 2:17:21 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162F414D94; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA49765; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 11:15:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Bruce Evans Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, green@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c References: <199907300904.TAA29532@godzilla.zeta.org.au> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 30 Jul 1999 11:15:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: Bruce Evans's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 19:04:31 +1000" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Bruce Evans writes: > > Yes, but that's not what's wanted here. Or rather, what's wanted here > > is the number of bits per *network* byte. > That's why I said "when the number of bts in a byte is actually wanted". > Strangely enough, it is actually wanted in the code changed by the commit > (which involves a bitmap implemented using an array of unsigned values). > This has nothing to do with network bytes. Ah. My bad. Then you're right, and CHAR_BITS is what's wanted. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message