From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 3 03:05:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA03103 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 03:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.NL.net (ns.NL.net [193.78.240.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA03087 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 03:04:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from spase by ns.NL.net via EUnet id AA14226 (5.65b/CWI-3.3); Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:20:32 +0200 Received: from deimos.spase.nl (deimos [192.9.200.239]) by mercurius.spase.nl (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id MAA25076 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:21:26 +0200 From: Kees Jan Koster Received: (dutchman@localhost) by deimos.spase.nl (8.6.11/8.6.11) id MAA00402 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:15:47 +0200 Message-Id: <199604031015.MAA00402@deimos.spase.nl> Subject: HDD cpu usage (NOT: IDE vs. SCSI). To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD hackers Mailing list) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 12:15:47 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hoi Hackers, When I originally posted my question it was not to (re-)ignite the old religious war on what system to use. All I want to know is if the CPU usage by my NCR 53C810 controller is excessive or not. Well, I guess the NCR does use a lot of CPU, and this is normal. Groetjes, Kees Jan ======================================================================v== Kees Jan Koster e-mail: dutchman@spase.nl Van Somerenstraat 50 tel: NL-24-3234708 6521 BS Nijmegen the Netherlands ========================================================================= Who is this general Failure and why is he reading my disk? (anonymous) =========================================================================