From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 5 18:43:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D228F158DC for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 18:43:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA20305 for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 18:43:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA28758; Wed, 5 May 1999 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905060143.SAA28758@vashon.polstra.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BitKeeper (was Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) In-Reply-To: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Chuck Robey wrote: > This discussion merits dropping, at least until someone rewrites > cvsup & ctm. Don't hold your breath. I haven't looked at bitkeeper, but I doubt anybody would have to _rewrite_ CVSup. It would just require that a new update method be added to handle whatever their files look like in an intelligent way. Until that was done, it's likely that CVSup's rsync method could handle them reasonbly well. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message