From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 21 1:42:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 103CC14C39 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 01:42:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 23060 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Jul 1999 08:39:57 +0000 (GMT) To: vince@venus.GAIANET.NET Cc: dillon@apollo.backplane.com, mrcpu@internetcds.com, modred@ns1.antisocial.net, leifn@neland.dk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poor ethernet performance? From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jul 1999 01:34:00 -0700 (PDT)" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 10:39:57 +0200 Message-ID: <23058.932546397@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Then either there is a hub between your net and the switch, or the switch > > is badly misconfigured. > > Well, the switch came out of the box and just had the default > setup.... It just has a IP assigned to it... And there is no hub between > the net and the switch since all the modem pools are each on their own > port. If the switch "just has the default setup" I would recommend that somebody sit down and read the manual and try to *understand* what is happening - probably also try to experiment a bit with the switch configuration. Because what you're seeing is definitely not normal. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message