From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 16 19:01:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED180860; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C41342E5B; Fri, 16 May 2014 19:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11C443BA8; Fri, 16 May 2014 14:00:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5376604F.9090809@marino.st> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 21:00:31 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Wills , John Marino Subject: Re: svn commit: r354249 - in head/textproc: . templates_parser templates_parser/files References: <201405161751.s4GHpvll092739@svn.freebsd.org> <20140516184419.GA63781@mouf.net> In-Reply-To: <20140516184419.GA63781@mouf.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 19:01:09 -0000 On 5/16/2014 20:44, Steve Wills wrote: > I wonder if it would make sense to prefix the ada using ports, much like the > p5- for perl ports, rubyem- for rubygem ports, etc.? I find this makes it > easier for me to find things, tho perhaps we just need a new (meta) category? > What do you think? I don't think it's necessary. Ada ports require an Ada compiler, and right now all ports use the same compiler, lang/gcc-aux. Anybody that wants to see a list of Ada ports all they have to do is go to < http://www.freshports.org/lang/gcc-aux > and see the "required for build" list. > Also, just wondering, does the Ada stuff have a utility like cpan or gem? No, nothing like that exists. John