From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  6 15:33:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7573E16A41C
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 15:33:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jett@angdatingdaan.org)
Received: from mail.emediaone.net (orion.emediaone.net [203.208.226.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D552443D58
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 15:33:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jett@angdatingdaan.org)
Received: from err.kern.crit (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by err.kern.crit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CB0450FA
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 23:23:01 +0800 (SGT)
Received: by err.kern.crit (Postfix, from userid 1017)
	id 2417F450F8; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 23:23:01 +0800 (SGT)
Received: from mail.angdatingdaan.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by err.kern.crit (Postfix) with SMTP id 1964D450F2
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 23:23:00 +0800 (SGT)
Received: from mach10.chikka.com ([202.175.229.210])
	(SquirrelMail authenticated user jett@angdatingdaan.org)
	by mail.angdatingdaan.org with HTTP;
	Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:23:00 +0800 (SGT)
Message-ID: <52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel@mail.angdatingdaan.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050706105612.W22721@beck.quonix.net>
References: <3b88b80a0507051933f4750f3@mail.gmail.com><06ef01c581f6$c54fb3c0$de0a0a0a@visionsix.com>
	<20050706105612.W22721@beck.quonix.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:23:00 +0800 (SGT)
From: "Jett Tayer" <jett@angdatingdaan.org>
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on orion.emediaone.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham 
	version=3.0.4
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: rndc reload and BIND9
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:33:40 -0000

a master/slave relationship is better. and will only "zone transfer" what
has changed :)


>
> Following a post I had about BIND9, I need to verify a certain behavior
> with BIND9 and issuing a rndc reload.
>
> Instead, of having a master and slave, I am going to have two masters. One
> master is the real master, the other gets replicated via rsync. The main
> reason for this approach is to cut down on all the zone transfers (we
> have 12,000 domains).
>