From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 13:39:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D1F37B401 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 13:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cobble.capnet.state.tx.us (cobble.capnet.state.tx.us [141.198.179.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1644643FA3 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 13:39:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsdstable@cobble.capnet.state.tx.us) Received: from cobble.capnet.state.tx.us (localhost.capnet.state.tx.us [127.0.0.1])h57KeYd5024282 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 15:40:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fbsdstable@cobble.capnet.state.tx.us) Received: from localhost (fbsdstable@localhost)h57KeYOW024279 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 15:40:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 15:40:34 -0500 (CDT) From: stuart nichols To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030607152936.D24263-100000@cobble.capnet.state.tx.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: What happened with 5.1-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 20:39:20 -0000 There used to be messages on this list around the time of a new release, letting people know what was happening, but that isn't happening this time. What list should the following question be directed to, if not this one? My auto-download program snagged a copy of the 5.1-RELEASE install ISO yesterday morning, but no release announcement was made. The directories exist on most, if not all of the ftpNN.freebsd.org servers, but the directories are protected, and the one I got it from changed to disallow further downloads. Did something go wrong with 5.1-RELEASE that required a re-work? The CD boots as 5.1-RELEASE, and loads normally. There are no cvsup deltas for RELENG_5_1, so no changes have been made available yet. What happened, and is there some horrible problem with the 5.1-RELEASE ISO I got that means I shouldn't load it? (Too late for that now.) It seems to be 5.1-RC1 with little if anything different except for a re-name of the version. stu stuart nichols CAPnet Network Operations