Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:13:05 +0000 From: h h <aakuusta@gmail.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: Matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <86k48sbcbi.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wRvSmTVv6c5EjuqoWTbhDLbFvF9k1G2cHj-q5JZ6gKdeA@mail.gmail.com> (Garrett Cooper's message of "Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:00:11 -0700") References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <4E8377F1.7020906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E838127.5090601@FreeBSD.org> <201109281245.40015.beech@freebsd.org> <CAGH67wRvSmTVv6c5EjuqoWTbhDLbFvF9k1G2cHj-q5JZ6gKdeA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> writes: >> >> So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm not >> going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to >> avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to >> build packages on my tindy and force install. > > Today no, but when someone in changes something in base or ports that > checks for __FreeBSD_version, yes. Since when `uname -r' (kern.osrelease) is dependent on __FreeBSD_version (kern.osreldate)? From what I've seen kensmith@ changed them separately http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225757
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k48sbcbi.fsf>