From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 20:50:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204537B401 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from revolt.poohsticks.org (revolt.poohsticks.org [63.227.60.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613E543FBF for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:50:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drew@revolt.poohsticks.org) Received: from revolt.poohsticks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by revolt.poohsticks.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h5G3oLJ86735; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:50:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from drew@revolt.poohsticks.org) Message-Id: <200306160350.h5G3oLJ86735@revolt.poohsticks.org> To: Joshua Oreman In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Jun 2003 10:29:02 PDT." <20030615172902.GB4882@webserver.get-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <86732.1055735421.1@revolt.poohsticks.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:50:21 -0600 From: Drew Eckhardt cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kqueue alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 03:50:55 -0000 In message <20030615172902.GB4882@webserver.get-linux.org>, oremanj@www.get-lin ux.org writes: >I would say, use select(2). >Is there a reason this wouldn't work? fd_set size... -- Home Page For those who do, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible.