From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 07:02:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77171106564A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C1A8FC14 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so15683623vbb.13 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:02:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oCVlAWeHrYSROMjGQDbi2xCXW0n7VqgOJiViWnYbqSw=; b=xjmHftovVQU8LJs/JzCl19s959XC6hijJj8qb+aaWMGXkSuJHF7v/ttmufXYK+7EHt 2TBTW605QLDHCexqcG4RtKvrauCir9/G5ypvbsDfH8IkCNFaALcv3LfKDR20sEOdaLHc R8whBNeUNUEEasiXoKNnoPhXT6NhXyiCFpyCs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.99 with SMTP id q3mr13006664vdi.100.1324969376433; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:02:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:02:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0F6CC18F-6973-42A2-AC03-F01BF59458AE@lassitu.de> <1100F70E-9DA9-4163-AC9A-423ECE5AA9A3@lassitu.de> <18CABB46-9B9A-41CB-8742-6723C5FF4D67@lassitu.de> <2CBD8651-E132-49DC-A082-37A8F5C626EA@bsdimp.com> <45529EC2-73BE-4F69-A9BE-E22D9FEAADD7@lassitu.de> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:02:56 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KMVZpcJL2vMvpiAhO9dIyX9picQ Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Stefan Bethke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Updated switch/glue patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:02:57 -0000 Hi, I've tested this code out: * The rtl8366 updates have dropped CPU use, thanks! * The iicbb code makes things unstable, as we discovered on irc * Using what's in -HEAD, the minimum stable delay is "5" * .. but when I use your iicbb changes, "5" is also unstable. So is something perhaps just plain wrong with the iicbb code? Adrian