From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 3 13:49:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326CE106564A for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (xiurhn.etoilebsd.net [94.23.37.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D4E8FC14 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 00F227E80D; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:49:48 +0200 (CEST) To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:49:48 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <51bb94aac2e461394eb532e5481fe053@etoilebsd.net> References: <51bb94aac2e461394eb532e5481fe053@etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: bapt@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 Subject: Re: why fully versionned vendorlib vendorbin and vendorarch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:49:50 -0000 On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:24:32 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:18:06 +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't get why we used versionned vendorbin, vendorarch and >> vendorlib with perl it seems to only provide us problems: need of >> perl-after-upgrade, reinstallation of most p5- things after even a >> simple 5.12.3 -> 5.12.4 upgrade? >> >> why not follow what is done by default by the build system and use a >> string (not versionned for those variable) like perl5_vendors or >> something like that? >> >> That would also allow user to upgrade from 5.12 to 5.14 almost >> painless. if really changing from 5.12 to 5.14 can lead to majors >> incompatibility problems (which I'm not convinced at all) we could >> use >> perl5.12 but not including the minor version which still is not that >> good to me but way better. >> >> regards, >> Bapt >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-perl@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-perl-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > As noone object I think that may say I can go ahead and fix that? > > regards, > Bapt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-perl@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-perl-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Forget this