From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 6 01:42:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1106D2; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 01:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F68A57; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 01:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898EF123F4; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:42:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from Peter-Grehans-MacBook-Pro-2.local ([64.245.0.210]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.4.4-GA) with ESMTP id BZM47408 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:42:35 +1000 Message-ID: <545AD209.1000907@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:42:33 -0800 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: centos 4 bhyve guest References: <20141106.073131.1811725327096373192.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20141106.073131.1811725327096373192.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:42:38 -0000 > Does anyone have an experience on booting CentOS 4 as a bhyve guest? > I want to convert one of my very old servers which requires CentOS4 > because of commercial software to a virtual machine, but I got the > following error when I tried to boot CentOS-4.8-x86_64-bin1of5.iso: Just tried that ISO and got the same result (a triple-fault). I'll look into it. later, Peter.