From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 18:28:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A0116A41C; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8519043D4C; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:28:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5SISlLV092612; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:28:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j5SISlL5092611; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:28:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:28:47 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050628182847.GB92486@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20050628154627.GJ40423@elvis.mu.org> <790a9fff05062809211c27a435@mail.gmail.com> <200506281844.07644.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506281844.07644.lofi@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: kan@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Scot Hetzel , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: libstdc++ version bump. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:28:50 -0000 On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote: > > > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above > > libraries? > > Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI > backwards-compatibility between gcc 3.3 and 3.4, too, but I'm not sure. There was. 3.3 could support either the C++ ABI of GCC 3.2, in which there was an implementation bug; or the fixed ABI of 3.4. I had hoped we had gone with the fixed ABI rather than being G++ 3.2 compatible, but that is what users wanted at the time. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)