From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Sep  1 15:54: 0 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C2714BF8
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  1 Sep 1999 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14063;
	Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:52:22 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA20666; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:52:11 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199909012252.QAA20666@harmony.village.org>
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Subject: Re: followup to apm problems. 
Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
	nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams),
	Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, mmuir@es.co.nz,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:45:00 PDT."
		<199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com> 
References: <199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com>  
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 16:52:11 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes:
: It's reasonable to assume this, yes.  However it's also worth bearing 
: in mind that since the BIOS isn't using these interrupts to _detect_ 
: activity, turning them off is pretty pointless.

Then why does the key up event cause the suspend to fail?

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message