From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 12 15:32: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from sid.c64.org (dial202-234.canit.se [195.190.202.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DDD15549 for ; Wed, 12 May 1999 15:31:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jd@sid.c64.org) Received: (from jd@localhost) by sid.c64.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA93195 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 May 1999 00:33:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jd) Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 00:33:47 +0200 From: Johan Dalstrom To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build of /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12 Message-ID: <19990513003347.A93169@fx.c64.org> References: <19990512234917.A92549@fx.c64.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <19990512234917.A92549@fx.c64.org>; from Johan Dalstrom on Wed, May 12, 1999 at 11:49:17PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Okay, PERL_VERSION= 5.00503 but why isn't the ports-tree uppgraded? Is there any special reason for upgrading bsd.port.mk and not /usr/ports/lang/perl5? And as I see it, it would be better to install via ports than installing by hand, because of the package-checking.. Am I wrong? Regards, Johan Dalstrom -- Johan Dalstrom / Network/Security Consultant / Powered by FreeBSD and caffeine. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message