Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:52:23 +0300 (MSK) From: "Cyril A. Vechera" <cyril@main.piter.net> To: gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@whistle.com Cc: cmsedore@maxwell.syr.edu, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: clustering/load balancing Message-ID: <199903230752.KAA21587@main.piter.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 20:19:19 1999 > To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> > Cc: Christopher Sedore <cmsedore@maxwell.syr.edu>, > "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> > From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> > Subject: Re: clustering/load balancing > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:18:49 -0500 > > Julian Elischer wrote in message ID > <Pine.BSF.3.95.990322030819.8498A-100000@current1.whistle.com>: > > so? > > I was just giving an example of load sharing using exisiting > > code. > > I probably wouldn't have A actually doing work, > > that way it'd be a hell of a lot more reliable, > > and hey, a PC is cheap..have another on standby. > > I wasn't faulting you Julian... there was a smiley firmly attached. If nothing > else, even if you remove that SPoF, you leave others (mainly between the `load > balancer' and the actual servers, unless you've figured out a way to have > redundant NIC's in your servers) heh, ok. let's think that we do not need any 'failure safe' technologies, only load balancing. in this way does 'forwarders scheme' is better than 'ARP patched'? or there are other underwater stones? Sincerely your, Cyril A. Vechera email:cyril@piter.net --------- http://sply.piter.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903230752.KAA21587>