From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 01:17:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DD716A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:17:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engine140.deployzone.net (engine140.deployzone.net [193.17.85.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6852A43D2F for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@zumbrunn.com) Received: from adsl-212-90-218-5.cybernet.ch [212.90.218.5] by engine140.deployzone.net; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 02:17:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200412271417.40038.krinklyfig@spymac.com> References: <20041223112731.GA32750@ninja.terrabionic.com> <41D081F3.6040802@elvandar.org> <200412271417.40038.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3F9E9778-586E-11D9-BA41-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Zumbrunn Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 02:17:32 +0100 To: Joshua Tinnin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: Remko Lodder Subject: Re: Rework of the FreeBSD website [was: FreeBSD's VisualIdentity:Outdated?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:17:34 -0000 On Dec 27, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > I like them, too. However - and please take this as constructive > criticism - make sure your reds match a bit more closely. The logo and > the mascot are a lighter (and slightly more blue) shade of red than the > color of the print, making them look almost pink when they're right > next to each other. I agree, the colors need more tweaking. > >> How do people see something like a breathcrum? (or whatever it is >> called) > > Breadcrumbs. Like crumbs from bread, left as a trail. Breadcrumbs could probably be part of an upcoming "real" redesign. But for technical reasons they can't be part of a "biggest bang for the buck" kind of face-lifting on the minimalist scope that I was suggesting with those screenshots. Chris